Instruments: ACIS

Previous: Project Manager's Report   Contents   Next: HRC



Instruments: ACIS

Update on the ACIS Contamination Issue and a Possible Bakeout
The degradation in the ACIS low-energy QE is continuing, presumably because the contamination layer on the ACIS Optical Blocking Filter (OBF) is continuing to increase in time. Analysis of the ACIS External Calibration Source (ECS) data indicate that the rate of increase in the contamination layer has been steadily decreasing over the life of the mission such that the current thickness of the layer is within 10% of the final value. The analysis of the ECS data rely on the ratio of the Mn L line complex to the Mn K-alpha line. A complementary analysis of the depth of the C-K edge has shown a linear increase in time in the depth of the edge, and hence a linear increase in the contamination layer. The most recent measurement of the C-K edge depth in December 2003 using PKS 2155-304 showed a significant deviation from the linear extrapolation. Thus, the two distinct measurements of the depth of the contamination layer may be coming into agreement with each other as the time baseline is increased. Further details on the degradation in the QE and the contamination layer may be found on the CXC web site at: "http://cxc.harvard.edu/cal/Acis/Cal_prods/qeDeg/index.html" , and: "http://cxc.harvard.edu/ccw/proceedings/index.html/presentations/plucinsky/index.html".

The effective area curves for ACIS in the PIMMS AO-6 software (SW) account for the contamination layer and use the expected thickness of the layer in May 15, 2005. Chandra GOs should use these effective area curves for the predictions for their Cycle 6 proposals. The appropriate ACIS RMFs and ARFs are available at: http://cxc.harvard.edu/caldb/prop_plan/imaging/index.html.

Chandra GOs who are analyzing existing data are encouraged to use CIAO version 3.0.2 with CALDB version 2.26, since this version of CIAO and the CALDB incorporates the correction for the contamination layer which was contained in the "contamarf" SW. GOs should refer to the web pages describing changes in the CALDB for more information: "http://cxc.harvard.edu/caldb/CALDB_curr_intro.html".

For future updates, check: "http://cxc.harvard.edu/caldb/" The Chandra project is still investigating the possibility of warming up the ACIS OBF in order to "bake-off" the contaminant. Since the build-up of additional contaminant is rather slow, it was deemed important to analyze the nature of the contaminant to the extent possible, to optimize the bake-out process including parameters such as the temperature profile and positioning of the instrument during bake-out, and to make sure there were no additional risks to be encountered during the bake-out. In the latter category, the team decided to place contaminants on a spare OBF and to test it against possible breakage via thermal cycling on the ground. Even though analysis and previous experience indicated very little risk in this regard, a very conservative approach was adopted. The Chandra project will continue to work on these issues in 2004 and will make a decision on a possible bakeout later in the year.

Paul Plucinsky for the ACIS Team



Previous: Project Manager's Report   Contents   Next: HRC




cxchelp@head.cfa.harvard.edu