To:sot_shift from: Dan Schwartz date: 21 Oct 99 , 11:00am EDT Subject: SOT shift report, Shift L90 -------- See http://asc.harvard.edu/acis/SOT_reports/sot-shift.html, or /proj/ascwww/AXAF/extra/science/htdocs/acis/SOT_reports/Oct_21_1999_L90.txt. Shift L90. Start at 294:11:00 GMT = 07:00am 21 Oct EDT End 11:00am 21 Oct SOT Lead DAS Spac/Aspect FOT/Sci liason HRC ACIS YMB (Times will be given in GMT on day 294. In general times are rough, not precise.) PLAN Continue running load p22e. In radiation belts. EVENTS 10:40 AOS 294:10:45 Confirm SIM in proper position, HRC-S at aim point, for Radiation belt passage 12:50 LOS Status at LOS, 294:12:49, was as follows: PCAD MODE = NPNT CONTROL LAW FLAG = NPNT Stars: = 5 FIDS = 0 RA = 130.805 deg DEC = 36.362 deg ROLL = 72.261 deg Format = 2 OBSID = 532 SIM FA = -535 SIM TSC = -99616 (HRC-S) HETG = OUT LETG = OUT HRC HV is OFF EPHIN: A-Leak = 0.5960 mu-a B-Leak = 0.1560 mu-a Next Comm 21:20 -- 23:00 NOTES/ISSUES/PROBLEMS Quick Look data notes: Southern Deep field subsequent to intervention to correct the FEP bias parameters, looks fine. OBSID 1431 Abell 2218, subsequent to intervention to remove use of FEP 0, looks good. OBSID 1454. (The original OBSID portion 553 using FEP 0 was also good.) Cyg X-3/HETG. OBSIDs 101 and 1456 both look good. To my eye, the level 2 processing seems to "split" each dispersed line down the middle. ? Cyg X-1 HETG, OBSID 107, failed aspect: recognized no stars or fid lights. Note that OBSID 1455 was NOT done. This was planned as an intervention into 107 to remove FEP 0. However, the available parameter block was only for Faint mode, and the observation required graded mode because the event rate was substantially exceeding the telemetry for Faint mode. From the 9am status meeting: Command load p23 has problems being scheduled. Currently not diagnosed, and we are approaching a deadline for final review. It needs to be uploaded no later than 296:13:15--14:55 as p22e expires on 296:18:15. Tagup assessment of status planned for 3pm today. Due to the very small, but measureable, 1 E-6, increase in ACIS CTI following the last belt passage, we want to remove ACIS from the aim point earlier during the descent into the belts, so we will re-institute a CTI measurement prior to belt entry starting in load P23. (Currently we did not move SIM to HRC position until about 1/2 hour before the current belt passage.) Note that the CTI measurements use 6 FEPs -- this may give some more diagnostic data on them. From the 10am ACIS ops meeting: Radiation damage has been eliminated as the source of the FEP0 problems. Therefore the team recommends leaving the FEP power on during the belt passages, on the rationale of not cycling things unnecessarily. Two experiments need to be done, via real-time CAPs, during the next load. First is targeted for Tuesday morning, Oct 26, to intercept at the start of the ACIS CTI measurement prior to belt passage. It will telemeter all 1024 rows of 8 to 12 columns. ------------------------------------------------------- Dan Schwartz, MS #3 das@head-cfa.harvard.edu phone: (617)495-7232 FAX: (617)495-7356 cell phone: (617)512-5627 pager: 800-759-8352 PIN 1636502 or e-mail 1636502@skytel.com -------------------------------------------------------