ACIS Memo #171 Rev A
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Center for Space Research
Cambridge, MA 02139
Room 37 558
To: ACIS Team
From: Beverly LaMarr (fergason@space.mit.edu)
Subject: ACIS Flight Energy Scale and Resolution as a Function
of Row
Date: 05 November 1999
This memo presents the energy scale and resolution of the ACIS devices
as a function of row position for days 262 through 286 of 1999 where
the CTI was stable. Figure 1 is a plot of the average CTI of s2 at
-110C.
The data from all 110C external calibration source measurements from
days 262 through 286 of 1999 have been summed. For i0, i1, i2 and i3
this includes OBSIDs 1310 1313 1315 1316 62373 62380 62377 62508 62371
62367 62366 62362 62361 62357 62353 and 62350. For s0, s1, s4 and s5
this includes OBSIDs 1311 1312 1314 1317 62375 62509 62379 62378 62370
62368 62365 62363 62360 62358 62354 and 62351. For s2 this includes
OBSIDs 1304 1306 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 62375 62373
62509 62380 62379 62378 62377 62508 62371 62370 62368 62367 62366
62365 62363 62362 62361 62360 62358 62357 62354 62353 62351 and
62350. For s3 this includes OBSIDs 1304 1306 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314
1315 1316 1317 62375 62373 62509 62380 62379 62378 62377 62508 62371
62370 62368 62367 62366 62365 62362 62361 62360 62358 62357 62354
62351 and 62350.
After the data for each chip was summed, the data from each output
node has been broken into thirty two thirty two row bins and only the
summed pulse heights of ASCA grade 02346 events were considered. For
each of the 256x32 pixel bins, a gaussian was fit to each of the three
main peaks (Mn Kalpha at 5894 keV, Ti Kalpha at 4510 keV, and Al K at
1487 keV).
Table 1 summarizes the total number of ASCA g02346 events from 0 to
2000 ADU, as well as the average number of counts in each of the
gaussian fits for each CCD.
Figures 2 through 31 are plots of the peak location of the gaussian
fit to the ASCA g02346 events for each of the thirty two row bins.
Figures 32 through 61 are plots of the full width half max in eV of
the gaussian fit to the ASCA g02346 events for each of the thirty two
row bins.
Figures 62 through 81 are plots of slope and intercept of the energy
scale for each of the thirty two row bins.
Also plotted here, as Figures 82 through 91, are the total number of
ASCA g02346 events from 0 to 2000 ADU in each of the thirty two row
bins. The first of the bins is low due to shadowing of the framestore
cover over the first several rows. These plots are included to give an
indication of the number of ''good'' events that are lost into ''bad''
grades due to the CTI.
Similar plots for ground data taken of the external calibration source
at -110C can be found following the plots of flight data.
CCD |
Total Exposure (seconds) |
Total g02346 |
Average Al |
Average Ti |
Average Mn |
i0 |
33352 |
2.99604e+06 |
3876 |
3846 |
12815 |
i1 |
33955 |
3.04854e+06 |
3952 |
3980 |
12953 |
i2 |
31807 |
3.04854e+06 |
3952 |
3980 |
12953 |
i3 |
32895 |
2.97459e+06 |
3911 |
4057 |
12499 |
s0 |
23046 |
1.95522e+06 |
2624 |
2548 |
8409 |
s1 |
68227 |
5.53978e+06 |
9728 |
7396 |
19728 |
s2 |
73236 |
6.76518e+06 |
9092 |
9470 |
28645 |
s3 |
157486 |
1.50408e+07 |
23393 |
21105 |
56346 |
s4 |
26292 |
2.46304e+06 |
3176 |
3470 |
10184 |
s5 |
26082 |
2.33158e+06 |
2983 |
3383 |
9731 |
Table 1. Number of Counts
External calbration source data was taken with the focal plane at -110C
while the ISIM was in thermal vac testing at Ball in October of 1997.
Table 2 summarizes the total number of ASCA g02346 events from 0 to
2000ADU, as well as the average number of counts in each of the
gaussian fits for each CCD.
CCD |
Total Frames |
Total g02346 |
Average Al |
Average Ti |
Average Mn |
i0 |
1489 |
8.09393e+05 |
1003 |
995 |
3483 |
i1 |
1489 |
8.09802e+05 |
1005 |
1009 |
3473 |
i2 |
744 |
4.10817e+05 |
513 |
521 |
1756 |
i3 |
1487 |
8.19236e+05 |
1022 |
1057 |
3474 |
s0 |
1496 |
7.91077e+05 |
996 |
956 |
3407 |
s1 |
1451 |
6.21725e+05 |
1116 |
831 |
2235 |
s2 |
3527 |
2.00456e+06 |
2498 |
2595 |
8478 |
s3 |
4241 |
2.17237e+05 |
3429 |
3051 |
8120 |
s4 |
1475 |
8.23350e+05 |
1013 |
1106 |
3442 |
s5 |
1426 |
7.75356e+05 |
928 |
1055 |
3258 |
Table 2. Number of Counts
The data from each output node has been broken into thirty two thirty
two row bins and only the ASCA grade 02346 events were
considered.
Figures 92 through 121 are plots of the peak location of the gaussian
fit to the ASCA g02346 events for each of the thirty two row bins.
Figures 122 through 151 are plots of the full width half max in eV of
the gaussian fit to the ASCA g02346 events for each of the thirty two
row bins.
Figures 152 through 171 are plots of slope and intercept of the energy
scale for each of the thirty two row bins.
Also plotted here, as Figures 172 through 181, are the total number of
ASCA g02346 events from 0 to 2000 ADU in each of the thirty two row
bins. The first of the bins is low due to shadowing of the framestore
cover over the first several rows. These plots are included to give an
indication of the illumination pattern of the external calibration
source.
Figures:
- s2 Average CTI at -110C.
- i0 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i3 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i3 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i3 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i3 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i3 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- i3 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- i3 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- i3 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i3 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i3 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 Al Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 Ti Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 Mn Peak Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i3 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i3 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i3 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 Al FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 Ti FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 Mn FWHM Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- i3 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- i3 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 Slope of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 Intercept of the Energy Scale Vs Row at -110C.
- i0 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- i1 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- i2 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- i3 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- S0 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- S1 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- S2 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- S3 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- S4 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.
- S5 ASCA G02346 Counts Vs Row at -110C.